The administration will not renew Venezuelans' 2-year humanitarian parole status. Reactions to Tuesday's army massacre of migrants in Chiapas, Mexico.
Get daily links in your email
Developments
This month will mark two years since the Biden administration inaugurated a program allowing citizens of Venezuela to reside in the United States with a two-year humanitarian parole status. Now, CBS News revealed, the administration does not plan to allow Venezuelan citizens to renew their humanitarian parole. If they do not seek to adjust their status, Venezuelan parole recipients will find themselves in legal limbo, subject to removal should the government in Caracas allow deportation flights to resume.
The parole program allows people to apply online from elsewhere and arrive by air, avoiding the U.S.-Mexico border. It has been available for up to a combined 30,000 citizens a year of Venezuela and, after January 2023, of Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua, who have valid passports and U.S.-based sponsors. Mexico used the program’s existence to justify accepting up to 30,000 monthly land-border deportations of those countries’ citizens.
Venezuelans who arrived in the United States before July 2023 are eligible to apply for Temporary Protected Status, a non-permanent but firmer documented status. As a result, for the next eight or nine months at least, most Venezuelans facing expiration of their parole have another option. It is unclear what might happen after that, or what might happen to citizens of Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua whose two-year statuses will begin to expire in January. The outcome of the November 2024 election will be a big factor.
Mexico began reckoning with an October 1 killing of six migrants by Mexican Army soldiers in the southern state of Chiapas. Another 10 were wounded.
That evening, soldiers chased, then fired on, a pickup truck carrying 33 migrants about 50 miles inland from the Guatemala border. Mexico’s Defense Secretariat (SEDENA) claimed that the vehicle “evaded military personnel” and that soldiers heard “detonations.”
Mexico’s newly inaugurated president, Claudia Sheinbaum, called the incident “deplorable,” adding, “a situation like this cannot be repeated.” Sheinbaum said that civilian prosecutors are questioning the two soldiers who fired their weapons; they have not yet been charged with anything.
Mexico’s Senate began its Thursday session with a moment of silence for the shooting’s victims.
The Human Mobility Pastoral, part of the Episcopal Conference of Mexico’s Catholic church, condemned the shooting as “the consequence of the militarization of migration policy and a greater presence of the armed forces on the southern border.” Added a statement from numerous Mexican human rights organizations: “Mexico has chosen to implement a migration policy without a human rights focus, making use of military forces, such as the National Guard, the Navy or the Army, as mechanisms for migration control.”
- Mark Stevenson, “6 Migrants From Egypt, Peru and Honduras Die Near Guatemalan Border After Mexican Soldiers Open Fire” (Associated Press, Associated Press, October 3, 2024).
- Patrick J. Mcdonnell, “Mexico Vows Inquiry After Soldiers Fire on U.S.-Bound Migrants, Killing Six” (The Los Angeles Times, October 3, 2024).
- Graciela Olvera, “Episcopado Mexicano Condena Muerte de Migrantes en Chiapas” (Milenio (Mexico), October 3, 2024).
- “Asesinato de Migrantes en Chiapas Es “Consecuencia de las Politicas Migratorias” del Estado Mexicano: Colectivo de Monitoreo–Frontera Sur” (Desinformemonos, October 3, 2024).
- “Claudia Sheinbaum Condena Muerte de Migrantes Abatidos por Soldados Mexicanos al Ser “Confundidos” Con Narcotraficantes” (La Hora (Guatemala), October 3, 2024).
- “Religiosos Piden a Sheinbaum una Frontera «Fraterna» y No «Militarizada»” (EFE, Efecto Cocuyo (Venezuela), October 3, 2024).
- Gabriela Coutino, “Cuatro Migrantes Atacados por el Ejercito Son Dados de Alta y Dos Mas Estan Graves” (Proceso (Mexico), October 3, 2024).
- Lliliana Padilla, Silvia Arellano, “Senado Guarda un Minuto de Silencio por Migrantes Fallecidos” (Milenio (Mexico), October 3, 2024).
At a September 30 meeting of the Texas House Committee on State Affairs, Texas Public Radio reported, a court administration official revealed that U.S. citizens were 72 percent of those accused of smuggling immigrants in the state between May 2023 and April 2024. Less than 10 percent were from Mexico.
The conservative news website The Center Square published unofficial data indicating that Border Patrol apprehended at least 1,525,210 migrants in fiscal year 2024, which ended on September 30. This number, however, seems slightly low: it would indicate that Border Patrol apprehended just 48,505 migrants in September (the agency’s reported October-August total was 1,476,705). Other sources have reported that September’s apprehensions totaled about 54,000.
Analyses and Feature Stories
In the first of a series about regional human rights and democracy challenges for the next U.S. administration, WOLA published five sets of principles to guide border and migration policy. They cover human rights and accountability, upholding asylum, comprehensive immigration reform, root causes, and regional cooperation and integration.
In a Wilson Center interview, journalist Molly O’Toole explored how global migration patterns are transforming due to U.S. policies, economic conditions, and environmental crises. That is the overarching subject of O’Toole’s forthcoming book The Route, which traces migration from Brazil to the U.S.-Mexico border. “It’s very difficult to think of a policy that the U.S. could conceive of that could stop people who are willing to die in order to make it,” she pointed out.
By declaring Mexican and Venezuelan criminal groups to be “terrorist organizations”—something the federal government has not done—Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) is carrying out a parallel foreign policy, noted an analysis by Francesca D’Annunzio at the Texas Observer.
“Democrats have traveled a long arc in the last four years,” reads a New York Times newsletter from Hamed Aleaziz. “When Biden took office, he spoke warmly of migrants seeking asylum and even tried to pause deportations altogether. (A court said no.) As his political fortunes sank, he turned toward deterring migrants. Finally, in June, he took a hard line.”
- Hamed Aleaziz, “A Crackdown” (The New York Times, October 4, 2024).
“The effect of immigration on wages is one of the most thoroughly studied topics in empirical economics, and the results are clear: Immigrants do not make native-born workers worse off, and probably make them better off,” explained Rogé Karma in an Atlantic essay.
On the Right