Donald Trump reiterates his intention to launch a mass deportation campaign. Dispatches from all along the border and Mexico examine the potential impact and advocates' response.

This is the final Daily Border Links post. Thank you for reading and sharing these as our year-long “rapid response” effort shifts down. The archive will remain online.

WOLA will continue to produce Weekly Border Updates, as we have for over four years, and we will continue to send them to the mailing list that you can join here.

For daily updates about migration, see the National Immigration Forum’s Forum Daily newsletter, and Mary Turck’s Immigration News site.

Developments

On November 6, a Donald Trump spokesperson told Fox News that the president-elect has a mandate to fulfill his campaign promises, including “on day one, launching the largest mass deportation operation of illegal immigrants.” The next day, Trump told NBC News, “It’s not a question of a price tag. It’s not–really, we have no choice” but to massively deport people.

A Reuters/Ipsos online poll taken after Trump’s election victory found that during Trump’s first 100 days in office, “25% of respondents said he should prioritize immigration, a much larger share than any other issue.”

Quiet preparations to implement “mass deportation” are now “ramping up” to full-scale planning, CNN reported. Advisers are discussing priority targeting of undocumented migrants with criminal records while they debate the next steps for “dreamers,” undocumented people who were brought to the United States as children. Slate pointed out that the deportation plan may count on the participation of local police departments nationwide.

Private security contractors that run prisons and detention centers are ramping up their own planning, CNN added. The stock prices of private detention companies like CoreCivic and Geo Group soared following Trump’s election. GEO Group’s board chair said his company was “well-positioned” to go from its present allotment of 13,500 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention beds to “over 31,000 beds.” But the incoming administration won’t immediately have the money to pay them unless it resorts to emergency authorities.

Unnamed Border Patrol agents shared their ecstatic response to Trump’s election with the Washington Examiner’s Anna Giaritelli.

A federal district court judge has struck down the Biden administration’s “Keeping Families Together” program, which sought to use humanitarian parole authority to allow hundreds of thousands of undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens to remain in the United States. Judge J. Campbell Barker, a Trump appointee, determined that the presidential parole authority for migrants, which dates back to 1952, does not empower a president to parole people already inside the United States. The administration is unlikely to appeal, since the incoming Trump administration opposes the program and will not defend it.

Analyses and Feature Stories

If Donald Trump acts after taking office to cut off legal migration pathways like asylum and the CBP One appointments program, migrants are certain to turn to smugglers and seek to enter the United States through other, more dangerous, means, experts and advocates told Associated Press reporters in Mexico. Shelter directors in Mexico, meanwhile, say that they have heard of no Mexican government plans to receive a large number of U.S. deportees.

On a visit to the capital of Mexico’s Chiapas state last week, Gretchen Kuhner of the Mexico-based Institute for Women in Migration saw migrants “getting their cellphones charged every day at some makeshift place on the street so they can check their CBP One appointments… while they’re breastfeeding and sleeping in a tent without any water.”

In a Mother Jones listing of likely Trump policies, Isabela Dias warned of “indiscriminate workplace raids, massive detention camps, and around-the-clock deportation flights.”

Dias and NPR’s Sergio Martínez-Beltrán spoke to immigrant rights defenders who plan to use litigation and other tools to seek to block or at least slow Trump’s planned closures of legal immigration pathways.

Gustavo Torres of CASA told NPR that his organization’s corps of activists “are expressing disappointment in the Democratic Party’s strategy and policy on immigration and that the Harris campaign failed to articulate or promote clear immigration or border policies such as pathways to citizenship. When the issue came up during the race, Harris would criticize Trump for scuttling a bipartisan border bill.”

At the Intercept, Aída Chávez pointed out that Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party have “nothing to show” for their rightward shift on border and immigration policy during the 2024 campaign and the latter part of the Biden presidency.

Several analyses examined the impact that a second Trump administration may have along different parts of the border.

La Verdad de Juárez reported that Mexican border cities like Ciudad Juárez should prepare for a “boom” of migrants trying to reach U.S. soil before Inauguration Day, January 20. That city’s “Somos Uno Por Juarez” shelter network is currently at 45 percent capacity, but that could increase. Analysts foresee more migrants turning to smugglers, taking dangerous routes to avoid detection.

Migrants awaiting CBP One appointments in Ciudad Juárez told Border Report of their fear that the CBP One program will soon disappear, and the odds of winning cases will plummet for those who manage to apply for asylum.

In Mexico’s southern state of Veracruz, through which many migrants pass while traveling between the Mexico-Guatemala border and Mexico City, state officials expect an increase in the number of people passing through between now and Inauguration Day, Milenio reported.

Officials in Baja California, Mexico, told Border Report that they, too, expect an increase in migration ahead of Inauguration Day. Shelters are currently at 60 percent capacity in Tijuana and 70 percent in Mexicali.

In California, the state with the largest undocumented migrant population, Wendy Fry reported at CalMatters, non-profits are bracing for the humanitarian impact of Trump’s policies and preparing to oppose them using tools like litigation.

Searchlight New Mexico voiced concerns that the coming crackdown is likely to increase fear in immigrant communities, deterring crime reporting, healthcare access, and social service use, while raids may increase the separation of children from undocumented parents. The publication foresees a further increase in migrants dying in New Mexico’s deserts as they seek to avoid apprehension. The article further notes notoriously grim conditions at the state’s ICE detention centers, like Otero and Torrance.

In Texas, migrant rights defenders are bracing themselves, the Texas Observer reported. “Texas is definitely going to be on the front lines of a mass deportation operation,” said Daniel Hatoum of the Texas Civil Rights Project.

Donald Trump’s election victory in south Texas’s majority Mexican-American border counties–a solidly Democratic stronghold as recently as 2016–is “the starkest example of what has been a broad national embrace of the Republican candidate among Hispanic and working-class voters,” according to a New York Times analysis. Voters were concerned about inflation and what they perceived as uncontrolled immigration. The Associated Press reported on the same phenomenon from Starr, one of the south Texas counties that ended a long streak of voting for Democratic presidential candidates.

The Economist recalled Trump’s threats to slap tariffs on Mexican goods if, in his view, the Mexican government is not doing enough to block U.S.-bound migration and accept U.S. deportees–including an agreement to be a “safe third country” for other nations’ asylum seekers, a status that Mexico has resisted.